Public Sentiment Toward AI and Digitalization in Government Services: A Sentiment Analysis Approach to Assess Bureaucratic Readiness and Trust

Authors

  • Pujiatmo Subarkah National Institute of Public Administration - Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Rezky Yayang Yakhamid National Institute of Public Administration - Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64423/arpa.v33i1.73

Keywords:

e-Government, AI in Public Administration, Digitalization, Government Services, Bureaucratic Difficulties, Sentiment Analysis, Public Trust, Social Media Analysis, Public Sentiment

Abstract

Given the speed at which technology is developing, public administration is about to enter a crucial transitional phase in which digitalization and artificial intelligence (AI) are being increasingly incorporated into government services. This study examines how the general public feels about digitalization, especially the use of AI in government agencies, with an emphasis on possible changes in bureaucracy and the resulting dynamics of trust. This study intends to map prevalent sentiments, both positive and negative, surrounding AI-driven reforms in public services by using sentiment analysis on a sizable dataset of public comments sourced from YouTube news videos about government digitalization and user reviews from nine priority government applications. To find the prevailing narratives and emotional tones reflected in citizen responses, the analysis looks into frequently used keywords and phrases. It also evaluates whether the sentiment trends indicate resistance, skepticism, or optimism about digitalization and AI’s potential to replace conventional administrative and public service roles. The results are used to assess how prepared government institutions are for the AI era and to suggest tactical methods for dealing with these administrative obstacles. Finally, by offering data-driven insights into public trust and expectations and suggestions for promoting openness, diversity, and flexibility in public administration, this study adds to the conversation on digital governance. Understanding public opinion is crucial to ensuring moral implementation and upholding the integrity of public service as governments increasingly use automated systems.

References

APJII (2025). Indonesia Internet User Penetration Survey

Antara News.(2022). BAKTI prioritizes free internet access in Indonesia’s eastern region. https://en.antaranews.com/news/240473/bakti-prioritizes-free-internet-access-in-indonesias-eastern-region

Bloomberg Technoz.(2023). Akses Internet Terbatas di Indonesia Timur Hambat Ekonomi Digital. https://www.bloombergtechnoz.com/detail-news/58309/akses-internet-terbatas-di-indonesia- timur-hambat-ekonomi-digital

van Dijk, Jan A.G.M. (2006). Digital divide: Research, achievements, and shortcomings. Poetics,

34(4-5), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004

Fukuyama, Francis. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and creation of prosperity. Free Press. Giddens, Anthony. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity: Stanford University Press.

Habermas, Jürgen. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press.

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2023). Laporan literasi digital aparatur sipil negara. Jakarta: KemenPANRB.

Lembaga Administrasi Negara. (2025). Future Skills Outlook for ASN, Survei Disrupsi dan

Keterampilan Masa Depan ASN. Jakarta: LAN.

Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. ((2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the web Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987), 20120382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382

Marres, N. (2017). Digital sociology: The reinvention of social research. Polity Press.

Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies. Government Information

Quarterly, 32(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001

Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of artificial intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008

Downloads

Published

2025-11-20

Issue

Section

Articles